Which of the following statements regarding the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is not correct?

The statement that CAS does not deal with appeals against doping-related decisions passed by confederations is incorrect because, in fact, CAS has jurisdiction over doping-related cases. CAS is designed to be an independent body that arbitrates disputes in the world of sports, which includes doping violations. Athletes and teams have the right to appeal decisions made by national federations or confederations regarding doping, and these appeals can be brought before CAS. This ensures that there is a clear and impartial process for addressing these significant matters.

On the other hand, CAS does not typically involve itself in appeals regarding the Laws of the Game, meaning that decisions made during a match concerning the application of the rules are generally not subject to appeal in this court. Furthermore, CAS does handle appeals against official decisions made by FIFA within a specific timeframe, typically 21 days, and the appeals may have a suspensive effect as determined by the court. Therefore, the assertion regarding doping-related decisions does not accurately reflect the breadth of CAS's jurisdiction.