Which statement about CAS's jurisdiction over doping-related decisions is false?

FIFA and its associated organizations, including confederations and member associations, operate under a framework where certain decisions, particularly those related to doping, can be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). While member associations can make their own decisions regarding doping cases, these decisions are typically not insulated from scrutiny or appeal.

The statement concerning the inability to appeal doping decisions made by member associations to CAS is inaccurate because CAS does indeed have the jurisdiction to hear appeals against these decisions under the rules of FIFA and international sports governance. Many athletes or parties affected by such rulings have recourse to appeal to CAS, thereby ensuring a level of oversight and fairness in the adjudication of doping-related matters.

In the context of the other options, CAS's role extends to handling appeals from FIFA regarding doping cases, and it also has the authority to address issues arising from confederations, ensuring that its jurisdiction is robust in the realm of doping appeals. This understanding highlights the importance of CAS in maintaining sport integrity across various governing bodies. Thus, the other statements are consistent with CAS's established jurisdiction regarding doping-related decisions.